NFP Preview: Will a US jobs beat on low expectations sustain the dollar recovery?
James Chen, CMT October 5, 2017 5:41 PM
Current NFP Expectations
On Friday, the new jobs data for September will be reported, and due to the substantially adverse effect of recent hurricanes (Harvey and Irma) on the US economy, it is widely expected that September’s job growth was negatively impacted. The extent of that impact, however, is not clear, and current expectations for the outcome run anywhere from a low of 80,000 jobs added in September all the way up to 110,000. A Reuters poll places the consensus around 90,000. The September unemployment rate is expected to have remained steady from the previous month at 4.4%, while average hourly earnings are expected to have increased by 0.3% against the previous month’s worse-than-expected showing of 0.1% wage growth.
The low expectations for the NFP headline data may well have overestimated the impact of the recent storms. If this is indeed the case, then a better-than-expected showing on Friday could be in store for the markets, which may sustain the US dollar’s recent recovery. Any such jobs beat would help support the Federal Reserve’s current policy trajectory towards higher interest rates, and possibly increase the already-high market expectations for a December rate hike by the Fed. Supporting a better-than-expected showing for the non-farm payrolls report on Friday have been key employment-related data releases this week, including the ADP private employment report as well as the ISM manufacturing and non-manufacturing PMI employment components.
Jobs Data Preceding NFP
Wednesday’s ADP data came out modestly better than expected at 135,000 private jobs added in September against previous forecasts of around 130,000 (which also took into consideration the two hurricanes’ impact). This relatively strong ADP reading despite the recent storms bodes well for Friday’s official data and suggests that low-end NFP forecasts may have overestimated the damage done to job growth in September. Although the ADP report is not necessarily a very accurate pre-indicator of the official NFP jobs data from the US Labor Department – and sometimes even misses the mark dramatically – it does help provide a useful guideline when used in conjunction with other employment-related data.
One of the most important of these other indicators is the ISM non-manufacturing (services) PMI employment component, which showed an even faster pace of job growth at 56.8 in September than in August (56.2). In addition, manufacturing PMI employment also grew faster in September at 60.3 against August’s 59.9.
Finally, September’s weekly jobless claims have all been better (lower) than expected, and have remained very low overall from a historic perspective.
Forecast and Potential Market Reaction
Despite severe hurricanes that are widely expected to have hit US job growth in September, it is likely that the economic damage may have been overestimated with respect to Friday’s jobs data. This should especially be the case since other key employment-related data suggest that September job growth may have been more resilient than expected. With consensus expectations ranging primarily between 80,000-90,000 jobs added in September, our target range is 120,000-140,000. Any result falling within this range or higher is likely to further boost a US dollar that has already been in recovery mode for the past four weeks. An outcome below 80,000 is improbable, so if that does occur, the dollar could be dragged down sharply. Between 80,000-120,000, the market reaction becomes less clear. If that is indeed the case, any strongly-defined market move would be unlikely, as the added uncertainty of forecasting the weather-related impact may peg September as an anomaly with little value in providing any guidance for the dollar.
NFP Jobs Created and Potential USD Reaction
Disclaimer: The information on this web site is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement. The information and opinions in this report are for general information use only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any currency or CFD contract. All opinions and information contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This report has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any particular recipient. Any references to historical price movements or levels is informational based on our analysis and we do not represent or warranty that any such movements or levels are likely to reoccur in the future. While the information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, author does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness, nor does author assume any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions.
Futures, Options on Futures, Foreign Exchange and other leveraged products involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Losses can exceed your deposits. Increasing leverage increases risk. Spot Gold and Silver contracts are not subject to regulation under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act. Contracts for Difference (CFDs) are not available for US residents. Before deciding to trade forex and commodity futures, you should carefully consider your financial objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained herein is intended as general information about the subject matter covered and is provided with the understanding that we do not provide any investment, legal, or tax advice. You should consult with appropriate counsel or other advisors on all investment, legal, or tax matters. References to Forex.com or GAIN Capital refer to GAIN Capital Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options.