2025’s Biggest Surprise: The (Lack of) Market Impact from Economic Policy and Data
2025’s Biggest Surprise: The (Lack of) Market Impact from Economic Policy and Data
Key Points
- My biggest surprise in 2025 was the lack of impact from economic data and policy decisions on markets.
- From the US tariff policy to central bank meetings to the US government shutdown, seemingly major traditional economic developments were less impactful than in previous years.
- Traders may want to take any official policy announcements and data with a grain of salt and at least become more aware of alternative data sources in 2026.
While there were plenty of surprising market moves in 2025 (the big rally to record highs in Gold and Silver, multi-year lows in oil, the continued march higher in equity indices all come to mind), my biggest surprise in 2025 was the lack of impact from economic data and policy decisions on markets.
The clearest example of this phenomenon comes from the US’s impositions of the highest tariffs in a century, a policy that many economists suggested would tip the world’s largest economy into a recession, with obvious implications for markets. As the chart below shows, the S&P 500 did see a quick decline on the release, but that move was rapidly reversed, before the imposition of most of the tariffs, and powered onward to new highs in short order:
Source: StoneX, TradingView
Of course, there were ostensibly logical explanations ex-post: The tariffs ultimately haven’t been implemented to the extent outlined on the world’s second-largest economy, companies have used alternative shipping points to sidestep the tariffs, carve outs have limited their impact, the impact hasn’t fully emerged due to inventory cycles, etc. Regardless, the ultimate impact for any traders who viewed this shift as anything but a couple week blip was that they overreacted
This same dynamic has played out in other policy announcements, from tax cuts to increased fiscal spending to central bank interest rate decisions to the longest government shutdown in US history.
Likewise, we’ve seen a widespread decline in the impact of historically significant economic data. Especially in the US, but to an extent in other countries as well, traders have quickly shrugged off “surprising” readings on inflation, jobs, GDP, and sentiment.
From my perspective, there are at least two reasons why we’ve seen this dynamic play out. Most importantly, the dominant theme of the rise of AI and the associated wealth effect have rendered more traditional economic measures less significant. As long as the AI “Hyperscalers” continue to invest in building data centers, the other aspects of economic growth and other data will continue to take a back seat:
Source: BEA, AnEconomicSense
The other reason traders have mostly disregarded economic surprises is that there are reasons to believe that the underlying data is increasingly not representative of the underlying economic conditions. Most economic data has been compiled via surveys for decades…and post-COVID, fewer and fewer people are responding to those very surveys:
Source: BLS, Bloomberg
Tautologically, a survey with fewer respondents is inevitably going to be less precise and indicative of the underlying conditions. At the same time, the widening political gulf is leading more and more consumers to evaluate the economy through their own political lens, rather than an objective view of the underlying business conditions. The UofM Consumer Sentiment survey, for example, has documented wild fluctuations in sentiment around elections, based solely on the current occupant of the White House:
Source: UofM, Jim Bianco
The good news, at least for news- and data-focused traders, is that this surprise may not be permanent. If the AI trade cools down or political biases become less salient in the coming years, traditional economic policy and data could quickly regain its previous importance for markets. Additionally, as we saw during the US government shutdown, alternative forms of data can help fill the gaps and provide a more holistic view of economic conditions, even if the standard data is marred by issues with response rates and political biases.
One key takeaway for traders heading into 2026 would be to take any official policy announcements and data with a grain of salt and at least become more aware of alternative data sources to help inform their trades and maximize their chances of success.
-- Written by Matt Weller, Global Head of Research
Check out Matt’s Daily Market Update videos on YouTube and be sure to follow Matt on Twitter: @MWellerFX
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as "FOREX.com") is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, FOREX.com does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date.
This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it. No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by FOREX.com or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.
The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although FOREX.com is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, FOREX.com does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.
FOREX.com is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company incorporated in England and Wales with UK Companies House number 05616586 and with its registered office at 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK, with FCA Register Number: 446717.
FOREX.com is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd. This website uses cookies to provide you with the very best experience and to know you better. By visiting our website with your browser set to allow cookies, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy. FOREX.com products and services are not intended for Belgium residents.
© FOREX.COM 2026