S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 Forecast for the Week Ahead
Equities Talking Points:
- It was a third consecutive week of indecision for Nasdaq 100 futures and the S&P 500 saw a strong bounce on Friday even after an inflation print that keeps the Fed on track for a rate hike next week.
- With bonds looking less and less attractive there’s still lacking opportunity cost for equity investors, but if we do see the 10-year crest above 5% and move towards the 5.25% that last traded in 2006 and 2007, that can shift.
The Nasdaq 100 is coiled, and given the backdrop, where inflation has remained high and expectations have pushed for a second rate hike by the end of the year, the deduction of that indecision over the past few weeks is that buyers have done an incredible job of responding to pullbacks.
The big test is next week, however, as the Fed is widely expected to hike rates by 25 basis points but perhaps the bigger item is the context surrounding that meeting. Kevin Warsh to this point has sounded rather hawkish, and this drove a pullback in equities after his first meeting in June by a strong rally after his second in late-July.
Nasdaq 100 Daily Chart
Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview
Perhaps most important is how markets perceive Warsh’s opinion of the wealth effect, or the premise that stronger equity markets help to drive economic activity. While this was something widely ignored 20 years ago, after the Financial Collapse it became a bigger item for the FOMC and it’s at least part of the reason why we got multiple rounds of QE and a bloated balance sheet that the Federal Reserve continues to carry.
There’s little vested interest in economic destruction so in multiple episodes, we’ve seen the Fed ignore above target inflation or even cut rates well-before CPI or PCE dropped below their own self-imposed 2% target.
That’s not where we are right now, however, as Warsh has highlighted this failure from the Fed to get inflation back-below goal and, instead, he’s prioritized this push. He made a convincing case in June, which is why equities sold off. But in July, with inflation still high and markets assigning a rough coin flip for a rate hike, he didn’t vote to tighten policy. The aftermath was a strong rally in both the Nasdaq and S&P 500 with the latter setting another fresh ATH. In the Nasdaq, the index has been a bit more cautious and this highlights a point of divergence that traders should take note of as we go into next week’s Fed meeting.
Nasdaq 100 (in Black) v/s S&P 500 (in Blue), Daily Chart
Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview
Nasdaq Lags S&P 500
The risk at this point is the fact that what was previously the leader into the first Fed meeting with Kevin Warsh, tech stocks and the AI trade, have started to lag behind the S&P 500.
This is similar to early 2000, when tech stocks topped well before the S&P, which was an early warning sign that the massive driver of equity strength was starting to slow down. There was a similar yield scenario taking place at the time, as well, as Treasury yields had jumped and seemingly offered an opportunity cost to market participants, who now had the option of locking up 6% in long-term bonds versus chasing yet another bounce in the dot com trade.
And this is where the grind sets up for next week, as the 10-year Treasury Note came just one basis point away from hitting the psychologically important 5% mark. Behind the push is the expectation for supply coming from a Treasury department that’s going to have to pay back principal on a considerable amount of long-term debt. But, also of issue is a US government that continues to spend, backed by a central bank that, to this point, hasn’t seemed serious about the 2% inflation target.
This is, after all, what initially drove the breakout in gold beyond the $2k level back in February of 2024, as Fed members talked up rate cut potential later in the year even with inflation far beyond their own self-imposed target. It’s perhaps also one of the big reasons why after that rate cut in September, bond markets sold off and yields went up, pretty much the opposite of what the Fed had wanted to see; because market participants aren’t usually going to ignore the fact that above-target inflation being surrounded by softer policy and lower rates will, likely, create higher levels of inflation down the road. And that will cut into bond returns and there’s even less reason to hold Treasuries for 10 or 30 years.
This is the delicate balancing act that Warsh has to walk, and it’s probably why he’s sounded as hawkish as he has even though President Trump had promised during the nomination process that ‘a willingness to cut rates is a litmus test for the next Fed Chart.’
Well, to this point, it’s been the opposite, and markets have seemingly warmed up to that fact. But Warsh will have to continue walking that delicate tightrope next week if he is to keep equity markets floating higher.
In the Nasdaq 100, it’s been the 30k level that’s been problematic, so I’m looking at that for an early indication of how that meeting is perceived. Support, meanwhile, is just below the $29 level and a breach of that will also be a break of the lower trendline from the symmetrical triangle that’s formed since Warsh’s introductory press conference. That would show bears taking greater control and the door for a deeper slide would open wider.
Nasdaq 100 Daily Chart
Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview
SPX
The S&P 500 has fared better by comparison, as the index hit a fresh all-time-high just last month and the pullback from that has, so far, been controlled. That’s not to say that higher yields haven’t produced a bit of fear as last week saw a lower-low test a massive spot of support, as taken from prior resistance. The daily doji on Thursday set up for an ‘abandoned baby formation’ which is a gap-down followed by a doji followed by a bullish gap-up. It’s similar in tone to a morning start which is often looked at with aim of bullish reversal.
And on that front, comparing the recent digestion in the Nasdaq 100 shows a greater bullish influence in SPX, as there’s been a bearish channel which sets up a bull flag formation in the index.
SPX Daily Chart
Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview
Strategy for Next Week
Comparatively, the S&P 500 retains bullish appeal while bearish scenarios would probably show more prominently in the tech heavy Nasdaq 100, especially given the build of a non-directional symmetrical triangle compared to the bull flag in the S&P 500.
--- written by James Stanley, Senior Market Analyst, Global Macro
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as "FOREX.com") is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, FOREX.com does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date.
This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it. No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by FOREX.com or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.
The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although FOREX.com is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, FOREX.com does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.
FOREX.com is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company incorporated in England and Wales with UK Companies House number 05616586 and with its registered office at 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK, with FCA Register Number: 446717.
FOREX.com is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd. This website uses cookies to provide you with the very best experience and to know you better. By visiting our website with your browser set to allow cookies, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy. FOREX.com products and services are not intended for Belgium residents.
© FOREX.COM 2026